Why following Submission Guidelines is a Good Idea

Imagine you are an employer. You have a vacancy. You don’t need to advertise to fill your vacancy because you get hundreds of unsolicited applications every day. But how do you decide who to recruit? Some of the applications are obviously unsuitable, but the bulk of them will be from experienced, qualified candidates who are all suitable for shortlisting?

At this stage, employers start looking for reasons to reject candidates, rather than reasons to accept them. That typo will put an application in the reject pile, so will that coffee stain as will that application using capitals, an irregular font and that application where the crucial information’s not in the order the employer expected. The employer hasn’t time to figure out how the skills an applicant has in their current role will transfer to the vacant role so the candidate who hasn’t bothered to spell that out will end up in the reject pile.

An employer looking for reasons to accept a candidate might overlook these factors or take the time to read between the lines and tease out the information they want. An employer looking for reasons to reject an candidate will not.

This is the position most poetry editors find themselves in. They have an overwhelming pile of poems to choose from so they start looking for reasons to reject poems.

An easy way of finding reasons to reject poems is to publish submission guidelines and ensure those guidelines are widely published. Poems sent outside the submission window or after the deadline: reject. Poems rendered almost illegible by an elaborate font or being printed on a patterned background: reject. Poems without contact details: reject. That sequence of traditional sonnets sent to a magazine that’s asked for experimental forms: reject. Poems that are not written to the requested theme: reject. Poems that are longer than the advised line length: reject.

Like the employer, editors are not going to look kindly on a poem that’s almost there if only the poet would drop the cliché from line two. Editors do not have time to help you rewrite your sonnet into a concrete poem. Editors don’t have time to look at your poem that’s six lines too long and tell you which lines should go. Equally they don’t have time to ask you to cut six lines and re-submit only to find that the six lines you cut were the exact same six lines that got them interested in the poem in the first place. They certainly don’t have time to tell you to reinstate the cut six lines and drop the fourth stanza instead. Much easier, and time saving, to automatically reject anything that doesn’t conform to the guidelines without even reading it and turn their attention to those poems which do meet the guidelines. After all, how fair is it for an editor to waste time on poems that don’t meet the guidelines to the detriment of the poems where the poet has taken the trouble to follow the guidelines?

What, then, does a poetry editor do with a submission where the covering letter states “my poem is x lines over the maximum stated in the guidelines. If accepted for publication, I can shorten it to the correct amount.”?

How can an editor accept a poem that will be changed before it’s published? What if the editor doesn’t like the changes the poet makes in taking lines out and decides to reject it after all? When would an editor enter into correspondence with one poet when they’ve an abundant choice of poems that do conform to the guidelines to select from?

Why deliberately make a submission that you know does not conform to the guidelines? The odds of publication are not in your favour so why create your own additional obstacles to getting published? Why would an editor work with a poet who has deliberately flouted the guidelines? Would a poet, who thinks the rules don’t apply to them, be more likely to have a professional attitude towards being edited or more likely to be difficult to work with?

At a time when editors are looking for reasons to reject submissions, make sure you don’t give them a reason to reject your poems. In some blog articles, I feel as if I’m stating the obvious but recent experience shows the obvious needs stating. Deliberately setting up your submission for rejection is a waste of time and could give you a reputation you don’t want.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: