Yes, Writers should be on Twitter:
- With 140 characters, you have to keep tweets to the point
- Keeping in touch with other writers
- Keep up to date with submission call-outs
- Keep up to date with publication news
- Useful for quick questions and links to help shorten research
- Useful for others to contact you
- Potential to pick up writing/reviewing commissions
- Holds reader engagement between publications
- If you are social and retweet others, the favour is returned
No Writers should not be on Twitter:
- If unmanaged, can become a procrastination tool/time suck
- Tweets are momentary and easily lost in the noise
- It doesn’t necessarily translate into sales
- It’s not a great tool to show off writing skills
- It encourages readers to interrupt your writing
- Writers should broadcast literature, not offer social/political comments
- It feeds a writer’s ego
No writer should be on twitter or any other social media outlet either. All writers should be free to decide which social media outlets (if any) work for them. For some of you that will be twitter, for others it won’t. And that’s absolutely fine.
If you’re enthusiastic about twitter, it will work for you. If you lack enthusiasm, it will show and could lose you readers.
What’s not fine is publicly criticising other writers for their choices. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to marketing and reader engagement.
BTW I’m @Emma_Lee1